|
Question: How does the O-Ring Test really work? My Name is David Lim, a psychology
major who has just completed my honors with a UK university and am traveling
around the world to broaden my 'limited' knowledge while searching for an institution
to further my studies. Just a week ago, I manage to learn about the Bi-Digital-O-Ring-Test
on my trip to Taipei, Taiwan. I found it totally fascinating. Very skeptical
about it initially but coming from a chinese Answer:
Webmaster's
note:
see the following
related technical discussions: A
Possible Mechanism of Bi-Digital O-Ring Test (BDORT)-Concept of the
Association of the Pineal Gland in BDORT [read
abstract] Chifuyu
Takeshige M.D., Sc.D., F.I.C.A.E., Prof. Emeritus, Showa University School
of Medicine; President, Showa University School of Medicine; Former Dean,
Showa University School of Medicine; President, Society of Japanese Ryodoraku
Medicine
COMPARISON
OF MOTOR CORTEX INDUCED-FLEXOR MUSCLE ACTIVITY INHIBITION BY HARD
PRESSURE ON VARIOUS PARTS OF THE BODY AND LIGHT PINCH OF ABDOMEN OF
ANIMAL WITH GASTRO-DUODENAL ULCERS PubMed
listing (option to order whole article) Tadashi
Hisamitsu, M.D. Professor and Chairman.Department of physiology,School
of Medicine, Showa University,Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan. ABSTRACT The
flexor muscle electromyogram (EMG) of the upper extremities in response
to the motor cortex stimulation was inhibited by hard pressure on
bases of ear lobe and lumber perivertebral region and by electrical
stimulation of these regions. Similar inhibition was produced by electrical
stimulation around the brachium conjunctivum and locus coeruleus (BC-LC)
and the reticulogigantocellular nucleus (NRGC). Inhibition of the
flexor muscle EMG due to hard pressure on the body parts was abolished
by electrical lesion of the BC-LC and NRGC. The light pinch with hand
on the restricted abdominal region did not inhibit the flexor muscle
EMG induced by the motor cortex stimulation in normal condition, while
such stimulation inhibited the flexor muscle EMG in ulcer suffering
animals after treatment with cysteamine. This inhibition was not influenced
by destruction of the NRGC. From these results, it was concluded that
inhibition of the motor cortex induced-flexor muscle activities caused
by light pinch stimulation of the restricted abdominal region, as
the model of the voluntary finger flexion inhibition in O-Ring test,
was produced by spinal reflex inhibition.
CEREBROPHYSIOLOGICAL
RESPONSE MECHANISM IN BI-DIGITAL O-RING TEST BY FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
OF HUMAN BRAIN WAVES - EFFECT OF CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES Noriyuki
Tani D.D.S., Shigeyuki Tanaka, Masaru Ono and Yoshihiro Yagyu First
Department of Prosthodontics Meikai University School of Dentistry
1-1, Keyakidai, Sakado-shi, Saitama Prefecture ABSTRACT The
Bi-Digital O-Ring test (O-ring test) developed in 1978 by Y. Omura
as a new diagnostic approach has gained a wide-spread recognition
in many countries of the world as a clinically useful test. In spite
of and contrary to the simplicity of its procedure, its mechanism
has remained largely unknown. It is especially obscure what cerebro-physiological
changes are induced or how sensitive the cerebral recognition level
is. In other words, since a stimulant applied in the O-ring test or
given by a chemical substance produces very feeble stimulation, it
still remains unknown whether the reaction occurring in the O-ring
test is identical to the conventionally-defined cerebral evoked response
or whether the reaction is induced through a completely different
response mechanism. To determine the mechanism on a cerebro-physiologial
level, it is necessary to define the potentiality of this test as
a human cerebral sensor as so described in 1965 by Tsunoda and in
1986 by Kikuchi et al. Our presentation at the Third International
Symposium on Acupuncture and Elerctro-Therapeutics has confirmed the
potentiality of the O-ring test as a human cerebral sensor, because
the reaction could be recognized as a cerebral response to weak light
of 80 luxs. This study was undertaken to further confirm our previous
results. Experiment was carried out using the same experimental system
as in our previous study presented at the symposium to confirm the
existence of cerebral responses to non-contact stimulation with chemical
substances delivered at a distance of 1 or 15cm from the stimulation
points at the regions of the oral cavity and stomach in 10 subjects.
The chemical substances used as stimuli consisted of potassium cyanide,
arsenic, paraformaldehyde, methyl methacrylate monomer, vitamin C
and toothpaste. The following results were obtained: 1. When
stimulated by a conventional manner of stimulation, cerebral evoked
potential tended to appear acutely at stimulation. In the O-ring test
with chemical substances, the appearance of the response (integration
of 10-second values )tended to be suppressed.
MUSCLE
FORCE MEASUREMENT FOR THE BI-DIGITAL O-RING TEST USING A COMPUTERIZED
ELECTRO-MECHANICAL SYSTEM Yasuhiro
Shimotsuura, M.D., F.I.C.A.E. ABSTRACT Measurement
of muscle force change during the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test (originally
developed by Y. Omura, of New York) was critically evaluated using
a computerized electro-mechanical system. This Bi-Digital O-Ring Test
muscle force measuring device can automatically and graphically display
pulling force, distance and time (horizontal axis), before during
& after pulling the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test by a motorized pulling
force control system, through its auto-analyzer, by replacing the
examiner's human hand with an electro-mechanical puller with constant
speed, which can be changed to different values. In normal persons
without any problems in the neck, arms, hands, and fingers, muscle
force of the Bi-Digital O-Ring formed between the thumb and one other
finger of the same hand showed the following order of magnitude: 1st-2nd
fingers, 1st-3rd fingers, 1st-4th fingers, 1st-5th fingers. When pulling
speed was too slow, particularly less than3cm/sec, muscle force change
appeared as 2 or 3 peaks, and therefore it was impossible to obtain
a reliable Bi-Digital O-Ring Test. When pulling speed was over 5 cm/sec,
response was an ideal one peak type muscle force change in reference
to time on the horizontal axis. Therefore, in order to do a reliable
Bi-Digital O-Ring Test, it is important not to pull the Bi-Digital
O-Ring too slowly, and one should pull with relatively fast speed
of over 5 cm/sec.This device was used to measure change of muscle
force during the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test, where pulling by a human
examiner's fingers was replaced by an electro-mechanical pulling system
with constant speed of over 5 cm/sec. In the following commonly encountered
different cases, the studies were carried out using this device.
|